Chancellor’s Initiative for Transformative Research
As the higher education landscape changes, UNC Greensboro aims to adjust through transformative and innovative initiatives. The Chancellor’s Initiative for Transformative Research (CITR) provides seed funding for promising projects that will lead to strong community impacts while attracting significant external funding. The goal of CITR is to engage researchers to launch projects that will strengthen the competitive position of UNC Greensboro in North Carolina, the United States, and around the World. Connection of projects to emerging national initiatives is critical to the funding of this work.
The proposed projects are expected to develop partnerships within and external to UNCG that establish cross-disciplinary and/or interdisciplinary projects and focus on advancing knowledge and building innovation, while exposing students to new experiences in these fields. It is anticipated that at least one proposal will be funded in each of the following categories:
Category I
Address pressing societal challenges (for example, housing, K-16 education, food insecurities, energy, and other areas of interest).
Category II
Revolutionize creative scholarship to bring awareness to a problem (for example, digitization, augmented/virtual reality, robotics, humanoids, 3D/4D Printing, and other areas of interest)
Category III
Respond to critical and urgent health and wellness needs (for example, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, autism, dementia, mental health, and other areas of interest).
Category IV
Advance critical technologies (for example, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, biotechnology, energy, and other innovative areas)
If no proposals in each category are deemed exceptionally strong, no awards will be made. It is recommended that an applicant select a category based on the content of the proposal. (It is recognized that some overlap between these categories exists, and therefore a given proposal may fit within more than one category. Individuals who desire assistance in selecting the most appropriate category should contact Vice Chancellor Sherine Obare). Once decided, the applicant will select the proposal submission shell (competition link) that corresponds to the appropriate category.
Selection Criteria
Priorities will be given to projects that hold the greatest promise for:
- Resulting in external funding opportunities and scholarly publications/products.
- Supporting regional and/or national innovation.
- Cultivating and/or building partnerships (for example, with businesses, industry, other academia institutions, government, non-profit organizations, and communities of practice.
- Demonstrating long-term sustainability
Eligibility
Full-time faculty, professional track faculty, and EHRA (EPS) non-faculty researchers. Applications may be submitted by a single individual seeking support for their work or by a team leader writing in support of a group proposal. It is anticipated that individual applicants and team leaders will have completed all work toward the terminal degree.
Instructions
Applications should be submitted via the InfoReady portal. For assistance with the InfoReady portal, visit https://research.uncg.edu/oretech/#infoready. The application will require the following components:
1. Cover Page:
- Title of the Proposal
- List of Name and Affiliation of each UNCG participants
- List of Collaborators or Partners and their affiliations
2. Abstract: 1-page limit.
3. Research Proposal: 5-page limit
Please use the following headings to delineate sections:
- Statement of Need
- Background and Significance
- Specific Aims
- Research Plan
- Significance and Impact of the Research
- Plan for collaborations and partnerships
- Regional/National Impact
- Management Plan
- Timeline
Supporting Documents
(The 5-page limit does not apply to the Supporting Documents section)
4. External Funding Plan:
Detail the plans for external funding and how the requested funding will lead to securing sources of significant external funding.
5. Reference/Citations List: No Page Limit
6. Biographical Information:
All participants on a project must submit a 3-page biosketch that is organized as follows:
- Education
- Work history
- Recent and relevant publications and/or performances
- Synergistic activities that are likely to increase likelihood of the project’s success
- Current Research Funding – Include a detailed description of current and pending funding for all individuals included in the proposal, including amounts, dates, and outcomes. Please provide a clear narrative for how this project fits into your overall research agenda.
7. Budget & Justification
A total budget not to exceed $75,000 must be attached. All applicants should include a detailed, itemized budget using the spreadsheet provided. In addition, the budget must be accompanied with a justification that clearly describes how funds will be used in each of the following categories. The budget form and narrative justification should be compiled into a single PDF and uploaded as a separate attachment in the proposal submission shell. Use of the Budget Summary Form (an excel file) available for download from the competition files section of each subcommittee proposal submission shell, is required. A separate page headed “Budget Justification” should contain narrative information for each budget category, including a description of the line items proposed in each budget category (one page limit). Be specific about budget item requests, especially for personnel (explaining number of hours and hourly rate, if appropriate, as well as the nature of work to be performed). The budget request should be presented in whole dollar amounts, rounding as needed. All budgetary items must be in accord with UNCG’s policies. Purchasing guidelines can be found at https://purchasing.uncg.edu. Employment of undergraduate or graduate students or other personnel must follow UNCG guidelines. For budget prep assistance, visit scholar.uncg.edu.
Allowable Expenses
- Salary: Salary is allowed for EHRA non-faculty who are driving a significant portion of the project. All salary will be subject to fringe. Salary for EHRA non-faculty is not to be paid in addition to current salary but instead will be to buy-out current salary funds, with approval of the supervisor, consistent with State and UNCG policy.
Summer salary is allowed for faculty who are on 9-month contracts.
Summer salary may not exceed 20% of the total budget. - Research Expenses: Expenses that are essential to the proposed project are allowed. These include materials, supplies, small equipment, software, databases, and other related expenses that can be justified for the success of the project. Budget items will be reviewed and may be adjusted or removed.
- Student Wages: A student (undergraduate or graduate) is eligible to work on a CITR project under the following criteria:
- Students must be in good academic standing
- Undergraduate and graduate students may be paid hourly wages
- Graduate students may hold a graduate assistantship (GA) if they fulfill the requirements to be compliant with the Graduate School GA policy.
- Subcontractors: Service Providers or contracted services must be clearly described and justified. A clear explanation of why the proposed work cannot be done at UNCG must be provided. Any funds to be allocated to external subcontractors must be allowable based on state guidelines.
- Travel: Include costs for travel that is absolutely required to conduct work to complete the project. CITR funds should not be used to present work at conferences. Instead, funds for travel to conferences should be requested through the UNCG Travel fund. Travel funds requested through CITR funds must be specific to fulfill success of the proposed work. Per diem and mileage rates must meet current UNCG Travel Guidelines.
- Other: Include any required costs that do not fall under categories (A-E)
Unallowable Expenses
The following are ineligible for support from the CITR and should NOT be included in the budget:
- Expenses incurred prior to the official start date of the CITR award
- Tuition or fees for students
- Salary for non-UNCG employees or students.
- Graduate or undergraduate wages or assistantships that are not directly related to the project.
- Software normally provided by Information Technology Services.
- Travel to a professional meeting or conference
- Add pay for personnel with existing 12-month contracts
- Add pay for faculty on a nine-month contract during the academic year, or in excess of summer salary from other grants that exceeds 3 months.
8. Letters of Collaboration & Support:
Applicants are encouraged to include letters of support from partnering organizations indicating their role and contribution to the project. A description of how the partnership will strengthen the proposal in seeking external funding is encouraged.
All awards will be evaluated on merit. However, once reviewers have determined which proposals are fundable, priority will be given to projects that address the Selection Criteria (as described above) most effectively.
Proposal Review Criteria
Proposals will be reviewed according to the following qualitative and quantitative criteria:
- Quality of the Summary Section
- Quality of the Background Significance
- Quality of the Project Design and Procedures and ability to execute the project as proposed
- Project timeline and ability to complete the proposed work within the given timeframe.
- Quality of the plan to seek external support to extend or expand the project
- Budget and Justification (Complete/Acceptable or Incomplete/Unacceptable)
Review Process
Awards will be based on a competitive review process. The reviewers will consider the merits of the proposed work based on the factors and scoring shown below and how the work will lead to transformation, innovation, and overall ability to bring distinction to UNCG. In addition, ability to attract major external funding will be a criterion for scoring.
- Significance: Reviewers will determine if the proposal address an important research issue that may lead to an area of distinction at UNCG.
- Investigators: The reviewers will evaluate if the team of researchers are well integrated with external partners to provide a unique approach that leads to an area of distinction.
- Approach: Proposals will be evaluated on their approach on the strategy to be undertaken and its ability to accomplish the specific aims and how that will create a transformative/innovative impact
- Innovation and Transformation: Proposals will be evaluated on their ability to lead to distinct transformative and/or innovative outcomes that have a regional/national/international impact.
- Potential for future external funding: Reviewers will evaluate the overall proposal and its ability to attract large future funding. Proposers are encouraged to identify programs within federal and state agencies, or foundations to where proposals will be submitted, as well as the possible funding to be acquired.
Scoring
Each proposal will be reviewed by at least two subject matter experts. The selection committee will be made of appropriate faculty and scholars with expertise in the topic area. Proposals will be given an overall impact score ranging from 1 (exceptional) to 9 (poor), based on the following criteria:
| Criterion Strength | Score | Descriptor |
| High | 9 8 7 | Exceptional Outstanding Excellent |
| Medium | 6 5 4 | Very Good Good Satisfactory |
| Low | 3 2 1 | Fair Marginal Poor |
Post Award Requirements / Expectations
- Progress Reports: A progress report describing the key findings, collaborations established, and external grants submitted is due no later than 6 months following the award completion. In addition, awardees will submit a final progress report 12 months after the initial progress report. The reports will be requested by the InfoReady Review Platform
- No Cost Extension: It is important that all awards are completed within an 18-month timeframe. Only under critical circumstances will a no cost extension (NCE) of the award term be considered for approval. A NCE must be requested before the end of the award. In the absence of an approved NCE, unexpended funds will be reclaimed by the Office of the Chancellor.
- Post Award Changes: Please ensure that any changes to the award (re-budgeting, change in PI, change in performance site, change in scope of work, change in timeline) are requested and approved prior to the initiation of any changes.
- Data Management Plan: Creation of a data management plan (DMP) using DMPTool is strongly encouraged.
- External Funding Plan: It is expected that external funding proposals be submitted soon after an award is granted.
Important Dates
Full-time faculty, professional track faculty, and EHRA (EPS) non-faculty researchers. Applications may be submitted by a single individual seeking support for their work or by a team leader writing in support of a group proposal. It is anticipated that individual applicants and team leaders will have completed all work toward the terminal degree.
- May 15, 2025: Proposal submission deadline in InfoReady
- May 18, 2025: Proposal reviews begin
- August 15, 2025: Award announcement
- September 1, 2025: Projects begin
- March 1, 2026: 6-month report due
- August 31, 2026: 12-month report due
- February 28, 2027: Project Ends
- March 31, 2027: Final Report Due.